Constitution of the
Bolivarian Republic
of Venezuela

Member: 
Password: 
Register Now   
Tuesday, February 09, 2010  / 3:04:45 PM

VHeadline.com remains 100% independent of all political factions in Venezuela
Oil & Gas
| More

Published: Saturday, January 28, 2006
Bylined to: Aljazeera.com

Petro-Euro?  The question now is what will the Bush administration do?

Aljazeera.com: Iran's nuclear projects, alleged WMDs, or its supposed support of "terrorist organizations" as the Bush administration claims does not pose a threat to Washington.

  • What does pose as a threat is Iran's attempt to re-shape the global economical system by converting it from a petro-dollar to a petro-euro system.

Such a conversion is looked upon as a flagrant declaration of economical war against the US which would flatten the revenues of the American corporations and could eventually cause an economic collapse.

In June 2004, Iran declared its intention in setting up an international oil exchange (a bourse) denominated in the Euro currency ... many oil-producing as well as oil-consuming countries had expressed their welcome to such petro-euro bourse.

According to Iranian reports this bourse is due to start trading in early 2006.

Naturally such an oil exchange would compete against London's International Petroleum Exchange (IPE), as well as against the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), both owned by American corporations.

Oil consuming countries have no choice but to use the US$ in order to purchase their oil, since the US$ has so far been the global standard monetary fund for oil exchange ... this in turn requires these countries to keep the US$ in their central banks as their reserve fund, therefore 'helping' in strengthening the American economy.

However, if Iran, followed by other oil-producing countries, begins to accept the Euro as another choice for oil exchange the American economy would suffer greatly, what many would call 'a real crisis.'

A 'crisis' such as this could be witnessed as early as the end of 2005 and beginning of 2006 when oil investors would have the choice to pay US$57 a barrel of oil at the American (NYMEX) and at London's (IPE), or pay 37 Euros a barrel at the Iranian oil bourse.

  • Such a choice would reduce trade volumes at both the US$-dependent NYMEX and the IPE.

Many countries have studied the conversion from the ever weakening petro-dollar to the gradually strengthening petro-euro system. The de-valuation of the US$ was caused by the American economy shying away from manufacturing local products, except those of the military, by outsourcing American jobs to cheaper developing countries and depending only on the general service sector, and by the huge cost of two major wars that are still going on.

What's more, foreign investors have started to withdraw their money from the shaky American market causing further devaluation of the dollar.

Any keen follower of financial markets would not have failed to notice that the devaluation of the US$ began since November 2002, while the purchasing power of the Euro has slowly, but surely crept upward. The US$ has also dropped in value in comparison to the Japanese Yen while the British pound climbed another notch.

Economic reports published early March pointed at the nose-dive the American economy has taken and to the quick rise of the deficit, up to $665.90 billion at the end of 2004.

The worst is still to come.

These numbers worried international banks, who'd warned the Bush administration of something like this would happen.

Iran is treading the same economical war path Saddam Hussein started when in 2000 he converted all of the Iraq's reserve from the US$ to the Euro, and demanded payments in Euro for Iraqi oil.

Many economists then mocked Saddam because he had lost a lot of money in this conversion ... yet they were very surprised when he recuperated his losses in less than a year due to the valuation of the Euro.

  • The US administration became aware of the threat when central banks of many countries started keeping Euros alongside US$ as their monetary reserve and as an exchange fund for oil.

In order to avoid an economical collapse the Bush administration hastened to invade and destroy Iraq under false excuses so as to set it as an example for any country who may contemplate dropping the dollar. It was also an attempt to manipulate OPEC's decisions by controlling the second largest oil resource -- sale of Iraqi oil has since been reverted back to the petro-dollar standard.

There is only one technical obstacle concerning the use of a euro-based oil exchange system, which is the lack of a euro-denominated oil pricing standard, or oil 'marker' as it's referred to in the industry. The three current oil markers are US$-denominated, which include the West Texas Intermediate crude (WTI), Norway Brent crude, and the UAE Dubai crude. Yet this did not stop Iran from requiring payments in the Euro currency for its European and Asian oil exports since spring 2003.

Iran's determination in using the petro-euro is inviting in other countries such as Russia and Latin American countries, and even some Saudi investors. This determination has led to the aggressive American political campaign in using the same excuses applied against Iraq: WMD in the form of nuclear bomb, support to "terrorist" Lebanese Hezbollah organization, and threat to the peace process in the Middle East.

The question now is what will the Bush administration do?

Will it invade Iran as it did Iraq?

The American military is already involved knee-deep in Iraq and the global community, with the exception of Britain and Italy, isn't offering any military relief to the US.

  • Hence an American strike against Iran is highly unlikely.

Iran is not Iraq; it has a more robust military power, has anti-ship missiles based in the "Abu Mousa" island which sits in the strait of Hermuz at the entrance of the Persian Gulf. Iran could easily close the strait and block all naval traffic carrying Gulf oil to the rest of the world causing a global crisis ratcheting the price of an oil barrel to $100. The US cannot topple the regime by spreading chaos the same way it did to Mussadaq's regime in 1953 since the Iranians are now more aware of such a trick.

Besides Iranians have a patriotic pride of what they call "their bomb."

What Washington has resorted to is the instigation and encouragement of Israel, to strike Iran's nuclear reactors the way it did to Iraq.

Leaked reports have revealed that Israeli forces are training for such an attack expected to take place next June.

Israel is afraid of an Iranian bomb which would threaten its military hegemony in the Middle East; would extract Israeli concessions and create an arms race which would gobble a lot of Israeli defense expenditure.

Furthermore the bomb would force the US to enter into negotiations with Iran further limiting Israeli expansion ambitions.

Threat to the US: Irans "nukes" or the Euro?

Enter Stock Symbol

Foreign Exchange Rates

Caracas Stock Exchange

Argentina

  Sao Paolo

Chile

  Mexico

Spain

  Toronto

London LSE

  France

Italy

  Germany

Israel

  Hong Kong

Korea

  Singapore

Editorial:

Roy S. Carson
Editor@VHeadline.com

Patrick J. O'Donoghue
news.editor@VHeadline.com

telephone
Caracas-VZ
(
0212) 335 7531
HOUSTON
(713) 893-1433

The Chavez Code: Cracking US Intervention
Bush Versus Chávez:
War on Venezuela
CODIGO CHAVEZ: DESCIFRANDO LA INTERVENCION DE LOS EE.UU. EN VENEZUELA
Hugo!: The Hugo Chavez Story
from Mud Hut to Perpetual Revolution
HUGO: THE HUGO CHAVEZ STORY
Alarm over Chavez ignores complexity
 Class, Conflict,
and the Chavez Phenomenon
Venezuela: Hugo Chavez and the Decline of an Exceptional Democracy
Changing Venezuela by Taking Power
 

facebook.com/vheadline -- twitter.com -- youtube.com/vheadline
spanish.vheadline.com - vheadlinevenezuelanews.blogspot - vheadlinevenezuelaenespanol.blogspot

Any opinions expressed in various VHeadline.com storyfiles across
this e-publication are the sole responsibility of the individual authors

If you find this site informative please help by clicking here  Thanks!

Now with cyber-charged Super Search
for high power researching performance


VHeadline.com remains 100% independent of all political factions in Venezuela
-- our aim is to report what's happening without submitting to lawlessness

VHeadline.net VHeadline.org VHeadline.biz VHeadline.info
VHeadlines.net VHeadlines.org VHeadlines.biz VHeadlines.info

Our editorial statement reads:
VHeadline.com Venezuela is a wholly independent e-publication promoting democracy in its fullest expression and the inalienable right of all Venezuelans to self-determination and the pursuit of sovereign independence without interference. Our stance is decidedly pro-governance (defined as being contrary to anarchy) and pro-government to the extent that we support all and any government policies aimed at consolidating and improving the living conditions and future prosperity of ALL Venezuelans, regardless of race, color or creed. We also seek to shed an international spotlight on nefarious practices and corruption which, for decades, has strangled this South American nation's development and progress. In every respect VHeadline Venezuela's declared editorial bias is most definitely pro-Constitutional, pro-Democracy and pro-VENEZUELA.
-- Roy S. Carson, Editor/Publisher Editor@VHeadline.com
VHeadline.com Venezuela is a foreign-based e-publication entirely focused on news & views from and about Venezuela in South America.  It is registered in the United States (Worth, Illinois) and hosted on dedicated servers in Vancouver (Canada) providing an active 24/7 network for Venezuelan businesses and information workers worldwide. VHeadline.com is read frequently by top decision-makers in over 142 countries -- 92.7% are based in North America while 97.63% of VHeadline.com readers are located in the commercial/ finance, high-tech sectors as well as at more than 2,360 universities, academic and research institutions around the globe.

With regularly updated news & views of Venezuela, VHeadline.com is monitored 24/7 by major global news gatherers and opinion builders!
Fair use notice of copyrighted material: This site contains some copyrighted material that in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of politics, human rights, the economy, democracy, and social justice issues related to Venezuela. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Editorial:
Editor
Roy S. Carson
News Editor
Patrick J. O'Donoghue
Caracas
(0212) 335-7531
Locations of visitors to this page
           

 
 
.
.