Constitution of the
Bolivarian Republic
of Venezuela

Member: 
Password: 
Register Now   
Tuesday, February 09, 2010  / 4:13:35 PM

VHeadline.com remains 100% independent of all political factions in Venezuela
International
| More

Published: Thursday, June 30, 2005
Bylined to: Eva Golinger

Eva Golinger: Venezuela rejects the CIA, but opens doors to the FBI and the DEA

Venezuelan-American attorney Eva Golinger writes: In mid June 2005, Venezuela’s national intelligence agency, the DISIP, underwent a crisis resulting in an Executive Order that called for a restructuring of the entire intelligence apparatus. The predicament was sparked by the escape of a Colombian drug trafficker, Jose Maria Corredor, aka "Boyaco," from the agency’s headquarters by paying out more then US$3 million to corrupt DISIP functionaries to secure his freedom. Though the Boyaco incident formally set the transformation into motion, changes in the DISIP were long overdue.

Venezuela’s pending extradition request of Cuban-Venezuelan terrorist Luis Posada Carriles, currently detained in an El Paso, Texas immigration center, has brought to the surface grave facts about the DISIP’s shady past and clearly evidenced the need for a thorough review of the agency’s operations.

Posada Carriles and his self-exiled Cuban cohorts held top positions in the DISIP during the late 1960s and early 1970s, utilizing the Venezuela intelligence division as a platform to wage their war against the Cuban Revolution. Venezuela became home to the largest Cuban exile community outside of Miami, and the base of operations for numerous terrorist activities that resulted in the death and injury of hundreds of innocent civilians in Cuba and abroad. Posada Carriles and others, such as Carlos ("El Mono") Morales Navarette, were also known CIA agents at that time, placed on assignment in Venezuela.

Recently declassified documents from Venezuela’s military intelligence agency evidence Posada Carriles later ran a private investigation company in Caracas that was fully outfitted with surveillance equipment and materials provided by the US Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). So even after he and his colleagues left the DISIP, they continued operating within Venezuela in the intelligence community, with full knowledge of the Venezuelan government, then headed by Carlos Andres Perez in his first term.

Considering that today declassified documents from the CIA and other US agencies have provided proof of US involvement in the April 2002 coup d’etat against President Chávez, the subsequent oil industry sabotage that again attempted his ouster and last year’s recall referendum on President Chavez’ mandate, in which more than $9 million was injected to ensure an opposition victory, Venezuela must be cautious of CIA meddling and presence within its borders.

And though Interior Minister Jesse Chacon swore in a new chief of the DISIP on June 20, 2005, Colonel Henry Rangel, and made a pledge to reorient the agency’s responsibility to focus exclusively on intelligence and counterintelligence activities, his claim that Venezuela would not work with the CIA but would work with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), raises concern.

Of course the CIA, FBI and DEA are three different agencies, but after the recent restructuring of the US intelligence system, which resulted in the creation of a National Director of National Intelligence (DNI) that would oversee all intelligence agencies in the nation, it is clear that the distinct agencies will have overlapping duties and responsibilities, filling in where others can’t act. And President George W. Bush’s chosen DNI, John Negroponte, is an individual who played a key role in the most heinous low intensity conflicts and interventions in Central America during the eighties.

Furthermore, confidential Venezuelan government reports say DEA agents in Venezuela have been involved in acts of sabotage, drug trafficking, infiltrations and violations of law intended to reflect poorly on Venezuela’s international reputation as a fighter of narco-trafficking. The reports evidence what has been proven in other parts of the world, that the Drug Enforcement Agency is used as yet another political tool of the United States government to promote its interests abroad. In the case of Venezuela, evidence demonstrates DEA agents have appropriated illegal drug shipments, bungling Venezuelan government efforts to seize and process drug traffickers, and have sabotaged numerous attempts to catch drug smugglers and traffickers. Instead of fulfilling its official role to aid in the seizure and arrest of drug traffickers, the DEA in Venezuela has played a criminal and interventionist role, evidently with the purpose of preventing the Venezuelan Government from complying with its international obligations. Nonetheless, the US embassy in Venezuela published a report in 2003; (International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2003) that generally praised Venezuela's cooperation with U.S. drug enforcement efforts.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in Venezuela operates from inside the US Embassy in Caracas. As typical in most U.S. Embassies around the world, the Legal Representative of the Embassy is the FBI field officer. It is difficult to fathom that this individual, working under the auspices of the US Ambassador to Venezuela, will not be promoting a pro-US agenda. As evidenced in recently declassified documents from the FBI regarding the Luis Posada Carriles case, it was the FBI officer in Venezuela that maintained contact with Posada Carriles during his years in Venezuela apparently as the liaison between the Cuban terrorist and the U.S. intelligence community.

Considering the notorious pasts of both the FBI and DEA in Venezuela, and their new relationship with the CIA and DNI, the newly structured Venezuelan intelligence agency would be wise to take great cautions when opening its doors to intelligence collaborations with the United States government.

Pentagon Disinformation War on Venezuela and increased military presence in Latin America

In a surprising act in the middle of the night on May 26, 2005, the Paraguayan government authorized the entry of US soldiers and military chiefs for an eighteen-month period, through December 2006. The midnight resolution also approved a regulation providing immunity to US soldiers for any violations of national or international laws committed on Paraguayan soil. Known as an Article 98 agreement, referring to Article 98 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, the resolution has been used by the Bush Administration to chip away at the credibility and jurisdiction of the ICC.

The initial request of the US government included the entry of thirteen (13) military contingents in Paraguay, comprised of 499 soldiers, equipment, weapons and ammunition. The US military presence will be used to build a base of operations in the Southern Cone, an area the Bush administration has repeatedly referred to as ripe for terrorists because of its porous tri-nation border. Currently, the US military has small operational bases in Aruba/Curacao, Manta, Ecuador and El Salvador, termed Forward Operating Locations (FOLs), and larger bases in Honduras, Guantanamo, Cuba and throughout Colombia. Since the coup d’etat against President Jean Bertrand Aristide in early 2004, the U.S. has increased its military presence on that Caribbean island, possibly with the long-term objective of building a permanent base. And the U.S. military still maintains a minor presence in Puerto Rico and Panama, despite base closures during the past few years.

The growth of US presence in the region falls in line with the new changes being adapted by SOUTHCOM, one of the five US military commands that cover the entire globe. SOUTHCOM is charged with Latin America and the Caribbean and counts on an $800 million budget and 1,400 regular staff members.

Recently, SOUTHCOM Commander Brantz Craddock accused Venezuela of generating "destabilization" in the region resulting from the government’s "threats to democracy". Craddock’s statements repeat the numerous declarations made by US government spokespersons, ranging from president Bush himself, to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Sub-Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere Roger Noriega and other lower-level players. The statements have been reiterated in US media, without providing solid evidence to back up such dangerous accusations, leading to concerns of a US media-government propaganda campaign against Venezuela.

Despite repeated denials from the US government regarding a campaign against Venezuela, a recent Pentagon restructuring authorized the deployment of "counterpropaganda teams" to Latin America, set to neutralize points of "potential terrorist activity and regional destabilization," amongst them, Venezuela and Bolivia. According to a report from the June 13, 2005 edition of Time Magazine, referred to in La Nacion Exterior (June 19, 2005, "EEUU lanza una Guerra de propaganda en la region"), during the last six months, the Pentagon has deployed teams of 2 to 4 military specialists in psychological operations to develop publicity campaigns that promote Washington’s interests in the Middle East, Latin America and other strategic parts of the world. The new unit, called the Joint Psyops Support Element (JPSE), nicknamed "gypsy" is based at the US Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, Florida. Considered "psychological warriors," the Pentagon has been sending these specialists to its overseas commands, armed with "plans for pro-US advertising campaigns to counter propaganda from enemies."

  • According to the Time Magazine article, "JPSE director Jim Treadwell told Time he eventually wants to send those units into Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America, where they would produce commercial-quality television ads, radio spots, websites and printed material to burnish the US’ image in those regions."

The JPSE team has a budget of US$77.5 million for the next seven years, in addition to extra funds available to counterattack accusations from "terrorist groups" in any nation. According to La Nacion, a SOUTHCOM spokesperson confirmed that the JPSE team will operate in Latin America, though specifics could not be provided. The JPSE team plans to contract four public relations agencies in the US during the next few weeks for $250,000 each, in order to design the basic structures of the propaganda campaigns.

Director Treadwell, who headed the 4th Psychological Operations Group during the Iraq invasion, confirmed that the idea is to "be as creative as possible." Such creativity could include the use of "black propaganda", information purporting to originate from the "enemy" to confuse and discredit society. According to Treadwell, "usually, we don’t use black propaganda. And if we did, I couldn’t tell you."

Considering that SOUTHCOM's new "theater of operations" includes as its first security objective, "improving the ability of partner nation security forces to protect critical infrastructure of the energy industry in the region", Venezuela, as the largest oil exporter in SOUTHCOM’s territory must be an area of prime focus.

The sixth objective of the new SOUTHCOM theater of operations also appears directed at Venezuela: "Prevent rogue states from supporting terrorist organizations." Since Latin America is not home to any "rogue states," and the SOUTHCOM objectives leave such countries unnamed, one can only be left to assume that Cuba and Venezuela are the points of reference. The Bush administration has accused Venezuela on numerous occasions of harboring groups considered terrorist by the US, such as the FARC and ELN from Colombia, despite never presenting any solid evidence. And recently, this author received a declassified secret document from the State Department alleging that groups such as Hezbollah and Asbat Al-Ansar receive operational and financial support in Venezuela and further claiming that the Venezuelan social organizations, Coordinadora Simon Bolivar, M-28 and the Jirajaras are groups engaged in terrorist activities. However, no concrete evidence has been provided to back these dangerous allegations.

Also, Venezuela’s commercial relationship with Cuba, a nation classified by the US government as a "terrorist refuge," clearly provides more reasons for SOUTHCOM to justify its growing intervention in the region.

Though a direct US military action in Venezuela still seems far off, the expanding military presence in the region, particularly surrounding Venezuela, the newly-launched PSYOPS teams intended to promote US interests and policies for propaganda campaigns, and the ever-increasing energy needs of the US all seem to imply an imminent operation against Venezuela is in the works.

  • Eva Golinger is a Venezuelan-American attorney specializing in international human rights and immigration law. She is the author of The Chavez Code: Cracking US Intervention in Venezuela, currently available on amazon.com or though her website www.venezuelafoia.info/codigo.html

Venezuela Rejects CIA, But Opens Doors to FBI & DEA

Enter Stock Symbol

Foreign Exchange Rates

Caracas Stock Exchange

Argentina

  Sao Paolo

Chile

  Mexico

Spain

  Toronto

London LSE

  France

Italy

  Germany

Israel

  Hong Kong

Korea

  Singapore

Editorial:

Roy S. Carson
Editor@VHeadline.com

Patrick J. O'Donoghue
news.editor@VHeadline.com

telephone
Caracas-VZ
(
0212) 335 7531
HOUSTON
(713) 893-1433

The Chavez Code: Cracking US Intervention
Bush Versus Chávez:
War on Venezuela
CODIGO CHAVEZ: DESCIFRANDO LA INTERVENCION DE LOS EE.UU. EN VENEZUELA
Hugo!: The Hugo Chavez Story
from Mud Hut to Perpetual Revolution
HUGO: THE HUGO CHAVEZ STORY
Alarm over Chavez ignores complexity
 Class, Conflict,
and the Chavez Phenomenon
Venezuela: Hugo Chavez and the Decline of an Exceptional Democracy
Changing Venezuela by Taking Power
 

facebook.com/vheadline -- twitter.com -- youtube.com/vheadline
spanish.vheadline.com - vheadlinevenezuelanews.blogspot - vheadlinevenezuelaenespanol.blogspot

Any opinions expressed in various VHeadline.com storyfiles across
this e-publication are the sole responsibility of the individual authors

If you find this site informative please help by clicking here  Thanks!

Now with cyber-charged Super Search
for high power researching performance


VHeadline.com remains 100% independent of all political factions in Venezuela
-- our aim is to report what's happening without submitting to lawlessness

VHeadline.net VHeadline.org VHeadline.biz VHeadline.info
VHeadlines.net VHeadlines.org VHeadlines.biz VHeadlines.info

Our editorial statement reads:
VHeadline.com Venezuela is a wholly independent e-publication promoting democracy in its fullest expression and the inalienable right of all Venezuelans to self-determination and the pursuit of sovereign independence without interference. Our stance is decidedly pro-governance (defined as being contrary to anarchy) and pro-government to the extent that we support all and any government policies aimed at consolidating and improving the living conditions and future prosperity of ALL Venezuelans, regardless of race, color or creed. We also seek to shed an international spotlight on nefarious practices and corruption which, for decades, has strangled this South American nation's development and progress. In every respect VHeadline Venezuela's declared editorial bias is most definitely pro-Constitutional, pro-Democracy and pro-VENEZUELA.
-- Roy S. Carson, Editor/Publisher Editor@VHeadline.com
VHeadline.com Venezuela is a foreign-based e-publication entirely focused on news & views from and about Venezuela in South America.  It is registered in the United States (Worth, Illinois) and hosted on dedicated servers in Vancouver (Canada) providing an active 24/7 network for Venezuelan businesses and information workers worldwide. VHeadline.com is read frequently by top decision-makers in over 142 countries -- 92.7% are based in North America while 97.63% of VHeadline.com readers are located in the commercial/ finance, high-tech sectors as well as at more than 2,360 universities, academic and research institutions around the globe.

With regularly updated news & views of Venezuela, VHeadline.com is monitored 24/7 by major global news gatherers and opinion builders!
Fair use notice of copyrighted material: This site contains some copyrighted material that in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of politics, human rights, the economy, democracy, and social justice issues related to Venezuela. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Editorial:
Editor
Roy S. Carson
News Editor
Patrick J. O'Donoghue
Caracas
(0212) 335-7531
Locations of visitors to this page
           

 
 
.
.